<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey Facebook, Monetize Our Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/</link>
	<description>community, entrepreneurship and business strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:17:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-59821</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/#comment-59821</guid>
		<description>Yea, just as Danny and I were talking (in the office), I think a subscription model just to allow the perception of an SSL encrypted page would be worth paying for.  Admittedly though, it would be better if it was a win-win for everyone, which usually means they take a percentage of a sale rather than just a monthly fee.  

But hey, how about even a freemium model of some sort.  You get 10 transactions, and then you have to move into the subscription or whatever.  There&#039;s a lot of room for them, and there&#039;s a lot of 3rd parties that are already available.

They could simply cut a deal with PayPal or Google Checkout or something that people already know.  Personally, I&#039;d rather use the credit card processor they already have.  Simply give us access to it and give us a monthly check for what&#039;s left after Facebook takes a cut, just like a regular merchant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, just as Danny and I were talking (in the office), I think a subscription model just to allow the perception of an SSL encrypted page would be worth paying for.  Admittedly though, it would be better if it was a win-win for everyone, which usually means they take a percentage of a sale rather than just a monthly fee.  </p>
<p>But hey, how about even a freemium model of some sort.  You get 10 transactions, and then you have to move into the subscription or whatever.  There&#8217;s a lot of room for them, and there&#8217;s a lot of 3rd parties that are already available.</p>
<p>They could simply cut a deal with PayPal or Google Checkout or something that people already know.  Personally, I&#8217;d rather use the credit card processor they already have.  Simply give us access to it and give us a monthly check for what&#8217;s left after Facebook takes a cut, just like a regular merchant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Radcliff</title>
		<link>http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-59819</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Radcliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/#comment-59819</guid>
		<description>I completely agree. There are many more ways to monetize than boring old useless advertisements. Facebook would do well to enable them, just as they&#039;ve done better by enabling a platform than they ever would have by creating content or applications themselves.

An existing model for this is cell carriers. They offer a billing/micropayments platform that makes it dirt simple for a customer to purchase things via the phone. They&#039;re already billing, so it costs them very little to offer to clients. Facebook would have to create a consolidated billing/micropayments/fulfillment platform, but it would reap almost immediate benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree. There are many more ways to monetize than boring old useless advertisements. Facebook would do well to enable them, just as they&#8217;ve done better by enabling a platform than they ever would have by creating content or applications themselves.</p>
<p>An existing model for this is cell carriers. They offer a billing/micropayments platform that makes it dirt simple for a customer to purchase things via the phone. They&#8217;re already billing, so it costs them very little to offer to clients. Facebook would have to create a consolidated billing/micropayments/fulfillment platform, but it would reap almost immediate benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
