<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Hey Facebook, Monetize Our Apps</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/</link> <description>community, entrepreneurship and business strategy</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 02:04:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: nate</title><link>http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/#comment-59821</link> <dc:creator>nate</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:12:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/#comment-59821</guid> <description>Yea, just as Danny and I were talking (in the office), I think a subscription model just to allow the perception of an SSL encrypted page would be worth paying for.  Admittedly though, it would be better if it was a win-win for everyone, which usually means they take a percentage of a sale rather than just a monthly fee.
But hey, how about even a freemium model of some sort.  You get 10 transactions, and then you have to move into the subscription or whatever.  There&#039;s a lot of room for them, and there&#039;s a lot of 3rd parties that are already available.
They could simply cut a deal with PayPal or Google Checkout or something that people already know.  Personally, I&#039;d rather use the credit card processor they already have.  Simply give us access to it and give us a monthly check for what&#039;s left after Facebook takes a cut, just like a regular merchant.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, just as Danny and I were talking (in the office), I think a subscription model just to allow the perception of an SSL encrypted page would be worth paying for.  Admittedly though, it would be better if it was a win-win for everyone, which usually means they take a percentage of a sale rather than just a monthly fee.</p><p>But hey, how about even a freemium model of some sort.  You get 10 transactions, and then you have to move into the subscription or whatever.  There&#8217;s a lot of room for them, and there&#8217;s a lot of 3rd parties that are already available.</p><p>They could simply cut a deal with PayPal or Google Checkout or something that people already know.  Personally, I&#8217;d rather use the credit card processor they already have.  Simply give us access to it and give us a monthly check for what&#8217;s left after Facebook takes a cut, just like a regular merchant.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris Radcliff</title><link>http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/#comment-59819</link> <dc:creator>Chris Radcliff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:01:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perfectspace.com/2007/08/24/hey-facebook-monetize-our-apps/#comment-59819</guid> <description>I completely agree. There are many more ways to monetize than boring old useless advertisements. Facebook would do well to enable them, just as they&#039;ve done better by enabling a platform than they ever would have by creating content or applications themselves.
An existing model for this is cell carriers. They offer a billing/micropayments platform that makes it dirt simple for a customer to purchase things via the phone. They&#039;re already billing, so it costs them very little to offer to clients. Facebook would have to create a consolidated billing/micropayments/fulfillment platform, but it would reap almost immediate benefits.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree. There are many more ways to monetize than boring old useless advertisements. Facebook would do well to enable them, just as they&#8217;ve done better by enabling a platform than they ever would have by creating content or applications themselves.</p><p>An existing model for this is cell carriers. They offer a billing/micropayments platform that makes it dirt simple for a customer to purchase things via the phone. They&#8217;re already billing, so it costs them very little to offer to clients. Facebook would have to create a consolidated billing/micropayments/fulfillment platform, but it would reap almost immediate benefits.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
